Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through links on Gadgetspotr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and servers) on. Learn more
88 Highlights 40 Differences 8 Reactions 0 Likes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W vs Anker 543: 88 Highlights & 40 Differences — So, Which Charger Actually Works Better
Helpful overview for users deciding between lightweight solo charging or a versatile multi-port solution. Which one’s your upgrade — Anker 713 Nano II 45W or Anker 543? We compared specs like usb-c ports, wireless charging power, cable length & interchangeable plugs and more to help you choose smarter.
Anker 713 Nano II 45W vs Anker 543 Charger (65W II): Which Charger Suits You Best?
If you're hunting for a reliable GaN charger, both the Anker 713 Nano II 45W and Anker 543 Charger (65W II) stand out as strong contenders. Each utilizes advanced GaN technology and offers fast charging optimized primarily for indoor use. Boasting high energy efficiency and advanced safety features like multi-layer redundancy and instant protection response, these chargers assure safe and efficient usage.
However, they diverge significantly in power output, port availability, size, and usability features. While the 713 Nano II focuses on simplicity, compactness, and single-device charging with a 45W max power, the Anker 543 stands as a powerhouse that supports up to four devices simultaneously with dynamic power distribution and a higher 65W max output.
A Compact Marvel: The Anker 713 Nano II 45W
For those who appreciate minimalism and ultra-portability, the 713 Nano II is tailored just for you. Classified as a pocket-sized device with a featherweight of just 0.15 lbs, it is perfect for travel and minimalistic setups. Its single USB-C port delivers a consistent and fixed output that simplifies your charging experience.
Additionally, the high heat dissipation efficiency ensures it stays cool under load using passive cooling, which keeps noise entirely at bay. Its sturdy polycarbonate housing with medium scratch resistance and strong drop rating provides a dependable build for everyday indoor use. The charger offers compatibility across laptops, tablets, and other devices, featuring broad backward compatibility and universal cross-brand support, making it beginner-friendly and dependable for simpler charging needs. Its standby idle behavior allows for energy saving while maintaining readiness for use.
Power and Versatility Embodied: The Anker 543 Charger (65W II)
On the flip side, the Anker 543 caters to users looking for more strength and flexibility. It provides a potent 65W maximum output and features four ports: two USB-C and two USB-A, allowing simultaneous charging of up to four devices, a clear advantage when juggling phones, laptops, tablets, and other gadgets. Its dynamic power distribution intelligently adjusts output among connected devices, optimizing charging efficiency.
Despite being larger and heavier than the 713 Nano II (at 0.3 lbs), it remains travel-friendly with a compact form factor and an impressive built-in cable management system that tidies up your setup. The longer cable length (~5 ft) adds to its flexibility in daily use. Its sturdier plastic housing offers high scratch resistance and enhanced environmental stress resistance, making it more robust for extended use scenarios. The charger's idle behavior powers off completely to save energy, which is beneficial for users emphasizing efficiency. Notably, the 543 also supports the Qi wireless charging standard compatibility, even though it doesn't itself deliver wireless power. Lastly, superior 24/7 customer support availability and multiple support channels ensure peace of mind for intermediates and power users who require durable daily reliability.
Quick Take
The Anker 713 Nano II 45W shines for travelers or minimalists needing a compact and lightweight charger with reliable single-port output and high heat efficiency. Meanwhile, the Anker 543 wins on power, multi-device versatility with four ports, and smarter usability elements such as longer cables and enhanced durability geared towards users with multiple devices or higher power needs.
Bottom Line
If your primary concern is an ultra-portable, simple, and consistent charger for mainly one device, the Anker 713 Nano II 45W stands out as the preferred choice. But if you value charging multiple devices at once with a stronger power profile, expanded connectivity, and superior support, the Anker 543 Charger (65W II) unquestionably offers a better all-around experience.
Verdict
Winner: Anker 543 Charger (65W II) - For its powerful 65W output, multi-port design, dynamic power sharing, and enhanced durability that suits varied charging needs and daily use.
Runner-up: Anker 713 Nano II 45W - Ideal for ultra-compact portability and efficient single-device charging, perfect for beginners and minimalist users.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
We dove deep into Anker 713 Nano II 45W vs Anker 543 — every major spec, performance test, and design callout is here to help you pick the right charger.
Both Anker 713 Nano II 45W and Anker 543 were released in 2021, ensuring they feature relatively recent technology suitable for current devices. This makes either charger a good choice for users looking for up-to-date charging solutions.
The year the charger model was first released to market.
In the battle of Release Year, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Release Year on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
75 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Fast Charging, GaN
85 Anker 543 0Votes GaN
vs Charging Technology
The charging technology of Anker 713 Nano II 45W includes Fast Charging and GaN, while Anker 543 uses GaN only. Both are modern technologies, but the additional Fast Charging capability in Anker 713 Nano II 45W offers enhanced speed for beginners.
Indicates the core technology used to deliver power efficiently.
In the battle of Charging Technology, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 10 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Charging Technology on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Describes the technical experience level required to use the charger effectively.
In the battle of User Level, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 40 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the User Level on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Intended Use
What is the intended use of this charger?
70 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Home, Office, Travel
75 Anker 543 0Votes Home, Office, Travel
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Designed for use in home, office, and travel environments, providing versatility across settings.
Anker 543
Designed for versatile use in home, office, and travel environments, making it adaptable for multiple charging scenarios.
Describes where and how the charger is primarily intended to be used.
In the battle of Intended Use, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Intended Use on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Source
What is the power source?
65 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes AC Outlet
85 Anker 543 0Votes AC Outlet
Anker 543
Power is sourced from an AC outlet, the standard household electrical supply.
Defines where the charger draws its power from.
In the battle of Power Source, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 20 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Power Source on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Charger Type
What type of charger is this?
45 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Wall Charger
35 Anker 543 0Votes Wall Charger
Defines the primary charger category based on form and usage.
In the battle of Charger Type, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 10 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Charger Type on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Device Compatibility
What devices are compatible with this charger?
80 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop
85 Anker 543 0Votes Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop
Indicates the types of devices the charger can power.
In the battle of Device Compatibility, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Device Compatibility on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Compatibility Notes
Are compatibility notes clearly provided?
Yes 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
No 0Votes Anker 543
Indicates whether additional compatibility limitations or requirements are clearly disclosed.
In the battle of Compatibility Notes, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 45 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Compatibility Notes on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Installation Type
How is the charger installed?
35 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Plug-In
45 Anker 543 0Votes Plug-In
Describes how the charger is installed or connected.
In the battle of Installation Type, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 10 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Installation Type on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Style
What is the mounting style?
45 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Wall-Mounted
65 Anker 543 0Votes Wall-Mounted
Indicates how the charger is physically positioned during use.
In the battle of Mounting Style, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 20 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Mounting Style on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Regulatory Region
Which regulatory regions does it support?
62 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes US, EU, UK
75 Anker 543 0Votes Global
Indicates the regions where the charger meets regulatory standards.
In the battle of Regulatory Region, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 13 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Regulatory Region on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Certifications
What certifications does this charger have?
58 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes UL, CE, FCC
70 Anker 543 0Votes UL, CE, FCC, RoHS, Qi
Lists official safety, quality, and compliance certifications held by the charger.
In the battle of Certifications, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 12 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Certifications on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Product Form Factor
What is the product form factor?
45 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Compact
55 Anker 543 0Votes Compact
Describes the overall physical form and size profile of the charger.
In the battle of Product Form Factor, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 10 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Product Form Factor on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Output voltage differs significantly: Anker 713 Nano II 45W outputs 5V, while Anker 543 outputs a higher 20V. The higher voltage of Anker 543 supports fast charging of laptops and larger devices effectively.
The voltage supplied to connected devices during charging.
In the battle of Output Voltage, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 15.0 Volt measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Output Voltage on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 713 Nano II 45W offers a maximum output power of 45W, whereas Anker 543 supports 65W. The 20W higher power in Anker 543 makes it more suitable for charging power-hungry devices like laptops.
The highest total power the charger can deliver to connected devices.
In the battle of Maximum Output Power, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 20.0 Watt measurement.
Based on community votes for Maximum Output Power, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ earned 0 votes, less than Anker 543 ◉, which got 1 votes.
Peak power handling matches the maximum output power for both chargers: 45W for Anker 713 Nano II 45W and 65W for Anker 543. This ensures stable and effective peak performance aligned with their max power specs.
The maximum short-term power the charger can safely handle.
In the battle of Peak Power Handling, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 20.0 Watt measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Peak Power Handling on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Input current for Anker 713 Nano II 45W is 1.87A, slightly higher than Anker 543's 1.8A. The marginal difference suggests similar power intake efficiency, suitable for consistent performance.
The amount of current drawn from the power source during operation.
In the battle of Input Current, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 0.1 A measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Input Current on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Both Anker 713 Nano II 45W and Anker 543 include short circuit protection, ensuring device safety during charging. This common feature makes either charger reliable for everyday use.
Automatically shuts down power if a short circuit is detected.
In the battle of Short Circuit Protection, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Short Circuit Protection on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Input Voltage
What input voltage does it support?
100 Volt 0Votes
100 Volt 0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Input voltage of 100 Volt supports operation in regions with this standard voltage supply.
Anker 543
The input voltage is 100 Volt, a common voltage compatible with standard North American electrical outlets.
The voltage range required from the power source to operate safely.
In the battle of Input Voltage, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ , delivering equal 100.00 Volt measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Input Voltage on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Current
What is the output current?
2.25 A 0Votes
3.25 A 0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
With an output current of 2.25 Ampere, the charger can support rapid charging for compatible devices.
Anker 543
Output current is 3.25 A, providing sufficient amperage for rapid charging.
The maximum current delivered to devices for charging.
In the battle of Output Current, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 1.0 A measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Output Current on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Power Consumption
How much power is used on standby?
0.1 Watt 0Votes
0.1 Watt 0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Standby power consumption is very low at 0.1 Watt, minimizing energy waste when the charger is not actively charging.
Anker 543
The standby power consumption is 0.1 Watt, which is very low, helping reduce unwanted power drain when the charger is idle.
Power consumed when the charger is plugged in but not actively charging.
In the battle of Standby Power Consumption, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ , delivering equal 0.10 Watt measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Standby Power Consumption on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Minimum Output Power
What is the minimum output power?
5 Watt 0Votes
5 Watt 0Votes
Anker 543
The minimum output power is 5 Watt, which ensures compatibility with low-power devices.
The lowest stable power output supported by the charger.
In the battle of Minimum Output Power, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ , delivering equal 5.00 Watt measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Minimum Output Power on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Overvoltage Protection
Does it prevent overvoltage?
Yes 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Yes 0Votes Anker 543
Anker 543
Overvoltage protection is included, safeguarding connected devices from voltage spikes.
Protects devices from excessive voltage output.
In the battle of Overvoltage Protection, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Overvoltage Protection on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Input Frequency
What input frequency is supported?
50 Hz 0Votes
50 Hz 0Votes
The electrical frequency range the charger can accept.
In the battle of Input Frequency, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ , delivering equal 50.00 Hz measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Input Frequency on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Efficiency
How efficient is the charger?
95 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes High
95 Anker 543 0Votes High
Indicates how effectively input power is converted into usable output power.
In the battle of Power Efficiency, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Power Efficiency on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Factor
What is the power factor?
95 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes High
95 Anker 543 0Votes High
Indicates how efficiently electrical power is drawn from the power source.
In the battle of Power Factor, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Power Factor on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Voltage Regulation
How good is the voltage regulation?
95 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Excellent
55 Anker 543 0Votes Good
Indicates how well output voltage remains stable under varying load conditions.
In the battle of Voltage Regulation, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 40 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Voltage Regulation on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Current Regulation
How good is the current regulation?
45 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Fast
65 Anker 543 0Votes Good
Indicates how consistently current is controlled during charging.
In the battle of Current Regulation, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 20 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Current Regulation on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Load Regulation
How good is the load regulation?
95 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Excellent
95 Anker 543 0Votes Excellent
Measures output stability as load increases or decreases.
In the battle of Load Regulation, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Load Regulation on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Ripple & Noise
How much ripple and noise is present?
95 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Low
95 Anker 543 0Votes Low
Indicates the level of electrical noise present in the output.
In the battle of Ripple & Noise, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Ripple & Noise on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Surge Protection Rating
How strong is the surge protection?
95 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Advanced
95 Anker 543 0Votes Advanced
Indicates the strength of protection against voltage spikes.
In the battle of Surge Protection Rating, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Surge Protection Rating on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Overcurrent Protection
Is overcurrent protection included?
Yes 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Yes 0Votes Anker 543
Prevents damage by limiting excessive current flow.
In the battle of Overcurrent Protection, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Overcurrent Protection on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 713 Nano II 45W can charge 1 device simultaneously, while Anker 543 supports up to 4 devices at once. For users needing multi-device charging, Anker 543 is the more convenient choice.
The maximum number of devices that can be charged at the same time.
In the battle of Simultaneous Device Charging, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 69 score measurement.
Based on community votes for Simultaneous Device Charging, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ earned 0 votes, less than Anker 543 ◉, which got 1 votes.
Simultaneous device charging is a major factor for me and the Anker 543 supports up to 4 devices which totally beats the 1 device limit on the 713 Nano II.
Anker 713 Nano II 45W remains on standby during idle charging, whereas Anker 543 powers off. Power-off mode in Anker 543 offers better energy savings, making it preferable for eco-conscious users.
Describes behavior when a device is fully charged but still connected.
In the battle of Idle Charging Behavior, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 20 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Idle Charging Behavior on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Power distribution is fixed in Anker 713 Nano II 45W, while Anker 543 uses dynamic distribution. Dynamic distribution in Anker 543 allows better power allocation amongst multiple devices, enhancing its versatility.
Describes how power is allocated across multiple ports.
In the battle of Power Distribution Method, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 85 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Power Distribution Method on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Heat management efficiency is high in both Anker 713 Nano II 45W and Anker 543, reducing overheating risks and maintaining charger durability during prolonged use.
Measures how effectively heat is managed during charging.
In the battle of Heat Management Efficiency, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Heat Management Efficiency on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Both chargers provide consistent charging performance, offering reliable power delivery without fluctuations. Either model meets expectations for stability during charging sessions.
Indicates how evenly charging speed is maintained throughout a session.
In the battle of Charging Consistency, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Charging Consistency on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum Charging Speed
What is the maximum charging speed?
45 Watt 0Votes
45 Watt 0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Maximum charging speed rated at 45 Watt ensures quick and efficient charging for supported devices.
The highest charging power delivered to a single device.
In the battle of Maximum Charging Speed, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ , delivering equal 45.00 Watt measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Maximum Charging Speed on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Stability
How stable is the charging performance?
35 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Stable
45 Anker 543 0Votes Stable
Anker 543
Charging stability is rated as stable, ensuring a consistent and reliable power output for connected devices.
Reflects how consistent charging output remains over time.
In the battle of Charging Stability, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 10 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Charging Stability on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Throttling Behavior
How does the charger throttle performance?
95 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Gradual
95 Anker 543 0Votes Gradual
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Throttling behavior is gradual, meaning the device reduces power output slowly under thermal stress to maintain safety without abrupt stops.
Describes how charging speed is reduced when limits are reached.
In the battle of Throttling Behavior, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Throttling Behavior on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Speed
What is the charging speed category?
55 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Fast
55 Anker 543 0Votes Fast
Classifies overall charging speed based on supported power and protocols.
In the battle of Charging Speed, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Charging Speed on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Intelligent Power Allocation
Does it allocate power intelligently?
No 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Yes 0Votes Anker 543
Automatically adjusts power delivery based on connected devices.
In the battle of Intelligent Power Allocation, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Intelligent Power Allocation on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Full Charge Time Estimate
How long does a full charge take?
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 543 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Estimated time required to fully charge a typical device.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Full Charge Time Estimate on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Adaptive Charging
Does it support adaptive charging?
Yes 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Yes 0Votes Anker 543
Adjusts charging patterns based on device needs and conditions.
In the battle of Adaptive Charging, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Adaptive Charging on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Device Detection Accuracy
How accurate is device detection?
95 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes High
95 Anker 543 0Votes High
Accuracy in identifying connected devices and their power needs.
In the battle of Device Detection Accuracy, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Device Detection Accuracy on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Startup Charging Delay
Is there a delay before charging starts?
No 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
No 0Votes Anker 543
Time taken before charging begins after a device is connected.
In the battle of Startup Charging Delay, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Startup Charging Delay on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 713 Nano II 45W features 1 USB-C port, compared to 2 USB-C ports on Anker 543. The extra port in Anker 543 supports charging more devices simultaneously, ideal for users with several USB-C gadgets.
Number of USB-C output ports for modern devices.
In the battle of USB-C Ports, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Based on community votes for USB-C Ports, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ earned 0 votes, less than Anker 543 ◉, which got 1 votes.
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W (Help us out by suggesting one!)
5 ft 0Votes
vs Cable Length
Cable length is unavailable for Anker 713 Nano II 45W but is 5 ft for Anker 543. The included longer cable with Anker 543 enhances user convenience and flexibility in device placement.
Length of the included charging cable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Cable Length on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 543 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum power delivered during wireless charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Wireless Charging Power on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Neither charger offers interchangeable plugs, so both require compatible local sockets. This limits plug flexibility but ensures a sturdy design regardless of region.
Supports interchangeable plug heads for different regions.
In the battle of Interchangeable Plugs, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Interchangeable Plugs on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 713 Nano II 45W has no USB-A ports, whereas Anker 543 includes 2. The presence of USB-A ports in Anker 543 caters to devices with legacy charging cables, adding compatibility.
Number of traditional USB-A output ports.
In the battle of USB-A Ports, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the USB-A Ports on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Total Ports
How many total ports does the charger have?
9 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes 1
35 Anker 543 0Votes 4
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
The charger has a single charging port, suitable for basic device charging needs.
Anker 543
Provides a total of 4 ports for charging multiple devices simultaneously.
Total number of output ports available for charging devices.
In the battle of Total Ports, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 26 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Total Ports on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Connector Type
What connector types are supported?
85 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes USB-C
85 Anker 543 0Votes USB-C
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
This charger features a USB-C connector type, which is widely adopted for efficient data transfer and power delivery.
Types of connectors supported by the charger.
In the battle of Connector Type, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Connector Type on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Charging
Does it support wireless charging?
No 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Yes 0Votes Anker 543
Indicates whether the charger supports wireless charging.
In the battle of Wireless Charging, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Wireless Charging on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Detachable Cable
Is the cable detachable?
No 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
No 0Votes Anker 543
Indicates whether the charging cable can be detached.
In the battle of Detachable Cable, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Detachable Cable on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Pass-Through Charging
Does it support pass-through charging?
No 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
No 0Votes Anker 543
Allows the charger to power devices while itself being powered.
In the battle of Pass-Through Charging, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Pass-Through Charging on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Placement
Where are the ports located?
75 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Front
55 Anker 543 0Votes Front
Location of charging ports on the charger body.
In the battle of Port Placement, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 20 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Port Placement on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Labeling
Are the ports labeled?
Yes 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Yes 0Votes Anker 543
Indicates whether ports are clearly labeled for identification.
In the battle of Port Labeling, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Port Labeling on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Durability
How durable are the ports?
95 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes High
95 Anker 543 0Votes High
Expected resistance of ports to wear from repeated use.
In the battle of Port Durability, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Port Durability on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Connector Durability
How durable are the connectors?
95 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes High
95 Anker 543 0Votes High
Durability of the connector interface itself.
In the battle of Connector Durability, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Connector Durability on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Magnetic Alignment
Does it support magnetic alignment?
No 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
No 0Votes Anker 543
Supports magnetic alignment for easier device placement.
In the battle of Magnetic Alignment, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Magnetic Alignment on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Daisy-Chain
Can it be daisy-chained?
No 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
No 0Votes Anker 543
Allows multiple chargers or devices to be linked together.
In the battle of Daisy-Chain, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Daisy-Chain on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Power Priority
How is port power priority handled?
45 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Fixed
95 Anker 543 0Votes Auto
Determines how power priority is assigned among ports.
In the battle of Port Power Priority, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 50 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Port Power Priority on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Weight differences are notable: Anker 713 Nano II 45W weighs 0.15 lbs, half the 0.3 lbs weight of Anker 543. The lighter Anker 713 Nano II 45W is favored for travel where reduced weight matters.
Total weight of the charger including built-in components.
In the battle of Weight, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 0.2 lbs measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Weight on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Width of Anker 713 Nano II 45W is 1.5 inches, compared to 3.54 inches for Anker 543. The narrower width of Anker 713 Nano II 45W supports easier portability.
The horizontal measurement of the charger body from side to side.
In the battle of Width, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 2.0 inch measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Width on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 713 Nano II 45W is classified as pocket size, making it very portable. Anker 543 is compact, but larger. For extreme portability, Anker 713 Nano II 45W is more suitable.
Overall size category based on dimensions and portability.
In the battle of Travel Size Classification, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 40 score measurement.
Based on community votes for Travel Size Classification, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ earned 1 votes, more than Anker 543 ◉, which got 0 votes.
Travel size classification matters a lot since I travel often The 713 Nano II classifies as pocket size which is super convenient compared to the compact size of Anker 543.
See more
Height
What is the height of the charger?
1.38 inch 1Votes
3.5 inch 0Votes
vs Height
Height is 1.38 inches for Anker 713 Nano II 45W, much shorter than Anker 543’s 3.5 inches. The lower profile of Anker 713 Nano II 45W adds to its travel friendliness.
The vertical measurement of the charger from bottom to top.
In the battle of Height, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 2.1 inch measurement.
Based on community votes for Height, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ earned 1 votes, more than Anker 543 ◉, which got 0 votes.
Anker 713 Nano II 45W uses polycarbonate housing, while Anker 543 is made of plastic. Polycarbonate is generally more durable and heat resistant, beneficial for long-term use.
Primary material used for the outer charger casing.
In the battle of Housing Material, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 15 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Housing Material on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 543 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs Drop Resistance
Anker 713 Nano II 45W supports drop resistance up to 3 feet, whereas this spec is unavailable for Anker 543. This advantage makes Anker 713 Nano II 45W preferable for accidental drops.
Maximum drop height the charger can withstand without damage.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Drop Resistance on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Material sustainability level is medium for both chargers, indicating moderate environmental consideration in manufacturing.
Use of sustainable or environmentally friendly materials.
In the battle of Material Sustainability Level, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Material Sustainability Level on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Both chargers include heat-resistant materials, enhancing safety and stability during high-temperature conditions.
Uses materials designed to withstand high temperatures safely.
In the battle of Heat-Resistant Materials, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Heat-Resistant Materials on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Scratch resistance is medium for Anker 713 Nano II 45W but high for Anker 543. Higher scratch resistance in Anker 543 means better longevity in appearance and surface protection.
Resistance of the surface to scratches and abrasions.
In the battle of Scratch Resistance, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 30 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Scratch Resistance on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Reinforcement
Are the ports reinforced?
95 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Reinforced
95 Anker 543 0Votes Reinforced
Anker 543
Ports are reinforced for enhanced durability and resistance to wear from frequent plugging and unplugging.
Indicates whether charging ports are reinforced for durability.
In the battle of Port Reinforcement, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Port Reinforcement on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Moisture Resistance
Is it resistant to moisture?
0 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes None
45 Anker 543 0Votes Splash-Resistant
Anker 543
The device has splash resistance, offering protection against incidental water exposure but is not fully water-resistant.
Ability to withstand moisture exposure.
In the battle of Moisture Resistance, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 45 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Moisture Resistance on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Material
What material is the plug made of?
55 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Metal
20 Anker 543 0Votes Plastic
Material used for the plug prongs and structure.
In the battle of Plug Material, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 35 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Plug Material on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Fire-Retardant Rating
What is the fire-retardant rating?
95 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes V-0
85 Anker 543 0Votes V-0
Fire safety rating of the charger materials.
In the battle of Fire-Retardant Rating, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 10 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Fire-Retardant Rating on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Surface Finish
What is the surface finish?
65 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Matte
25 Anker 543 0Votes Matte
External surface finish affecting grip and aesthetics.
In the battle of Surface Finish, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 40 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Surface Finish on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Build Rigidity
How rigid is the charger build?
95 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Solid
95 Anker 543 0Votes Solid
Overall structural stiffness of the charger body.
In the battle of Build Rigidity, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Build Rigidity on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal fail-safe mode is included in both Anker 713 Nano II 45W and Anker 543, helping prevent damage from overheating.
Emergency mode that safely disables charging during extreme heat.
In the battle of Thermal Fail-Safe Mode, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Thermal Fail-Safe Mode on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Prevents accidental insertion of objects into live ports.
In the battle of Child Safety Shutter, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Child Safety Shutter on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Safety redundancy level is multi-layer for both Anker 713 Nano II 45W and Anker 543, ensuring enhanced device protection and peace of mind during charging.
Indicates the number of safety systems working together.
In the battle of Safety Redundancy Level, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Safety Redundancy Level on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Protection response time is instant on both models, providing quick reaction to potential hazards and reducing risk to devices.
Time taken for protection systems to activate during a fault.
In the battle of Protection Response Time, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Protection Response Time on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Certification Level
What is the safety certification level?
95 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Premium
75 Anker 543 0Votes Enhanced
Anker 543
The safety certification level is enhanced, indicating a higher standard of protection beyond basic certifications.
Overall strength of safety certifications achieved.
In the battle of Safety Certification Level, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 20 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Safety Certification Level on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Overheat Protection
Does it have overheat protection?
Yes 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Yes 0Votes Anker 543
Automatically reduces or shuts off power when excessive heat is detected.
In the battle of Overheat Protection, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Overheat Protection on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Monitoring
Is temperature actively monitored?
Yes 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Yes 0Votes Anker 543
Continuously monitors internal temperature during operation.
In the battle of Temperature Monitoring, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Temperature Monitoring on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Electrical Isolation
Is electrical isolation implemented?
Yes 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Yes 0Votes Anker 543
Separates high-voltage and low-voltage components for safety.
In the battle of Electrical Isolation, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Electrical Isolation on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Anti-Spark Protection
Does it have anti-spark protection?
Yes 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Yes 0Votes Anker 543
Reduces sparking when plugging or unplugging devices.
In the battle of Anti-Spark Protection, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Anti-Spark Protection on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
EMI Protection
Is EMI protection included?
Yes 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Yes 0Votes Anker 543
Protects against electromagnetic interference affecting nearby electronics.
In the battle of EMI Protection, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the EMI Protection on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
ESD Protection
Is ESD protection supported?
Yes 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Yes 0Votes Anker 543
Shields the charger from electrostatic discharge damage.
In the battle of ESD Protection, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the ESD Protection on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Shut-Off
Does it shut off automatically?
Yes 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Yes 0Votes Anker 543
Automatically cuts power when unsafe conditions are detected.
In the battle of Auto Shut-Off, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Auto Shut-Off on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Fault Detection
Can it detect electrical faults?
Yes 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Yes 0Votes Anker 543
Detects abnormal electrical conditions during operation.
In the battle of Fault Detection, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Fault Detection on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W (Help us out by suggesting one!)
74 Anker 543 0Votes Qi
Specifies the wireless charging standard supported.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Wireless Charging Standard on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Level of compatibility across different device brands.
In the battle of Cross-Brand Compatibility, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Cross-Brand Compatibility on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
USB Power Delivery
Does it support USB Power Delivery?
Yes 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Yes 0Votes Anker 543
Anker 543
USB Power Delivery is supported, enabling faster and safer charging for compatible devices.
Indicates support for the USB Power Delivery standard for fast and flexible charging.
In the battle of USB Power Delivery, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the USB Power Delivery on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
PPS
Does it support PPS?
Yes 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Yes 0Votes Anker 543
Anker 543
PPS (Programmable Power Supply) is supported, allowing the charger to dynamically adjust voltage and current for optimized fast charging of compatible devices.
Supports Programmable Power Supply for efficient fast charging.
In the battle of PPS, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the PPS on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Android Charging
Is it compatible with Android devices?
Yes 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Yes 0Votes Anker 543
Anker 543
Supports charging for Android devices, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of smartphones and tablets.
Ensures compatibility with Android devices and charging protocols.
In the battle of Android Charging, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Android Charging on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Quick Charge
Does it support Quick Charge?
Yes 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Yes 0Votes Anker 543
Indicates compatibility with Qualcomm Quick Charge technology.
In the battle of Quick Charge, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Quick Charge on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Apple Charging
Is it compatible with Apple devices?
Yes 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Yes 0Votes Anker 543
Optimized compatibility with Apple devices and charging requirements.
In the battle of Apple Charging, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Apple Charging on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Wearable Charging
Can it charge wearables?
Yes 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Yes 0Votes Anker 543
Supports charging of wearables like smartwatches or earbuds.
In the battle of Wearable Charging, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Wearable Charging on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Proprietary Protocol, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Proprietary Protocol on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
The thermal dissipation method used is Passive, meaning the device relies on heat sinks or natural convection without fans for cooling. Passive cooling tends to be quieter and requires less maintenance compared to active cooling.
Method used to release heat during operation.
In the battle of Thermal Dissipation Method, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 30 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Thermal Dissipation Method on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal throttling threshold is 176 °F (80 °C), meaning the charger will reduce power output to avoid overheating beyond this temperature.
Temperature at which charging power is reduced to prevent overheating.
In the battle of Thermal Throttling Threshold, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ , delivering equal 176.00 °F measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Thermal Throttling Threshold on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature stability during prolonged high-load charging.
In the battle of Sustained Load Temperature Stability, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Sustained Load Temperature Stability on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Temperature Range
What is the storage temperature range?
55 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes -4–140°F
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 543 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
The storage temperature range is from -4 to 140°F (approximately -20 to 60°C), ensuring the device can be safely stored in various climates.
Temperature range safe for storing the charger when not in use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Storage Temperature Range on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Cooling Design
What internal cooling design is used?
35 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Heat Sink
65 Anker 543 0Votes Heat Sink
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
An internal heat sink is used for cooling, helping maintain optimal operating temperatures silently.
Internal structure designed to manage heat.
In the battle of Internal Cooling Design, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 30 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Internal Cooling Design on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Ambient Temperature Tolerance
How tolerant is it to ambient temperatures?
45 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Medium
0 Anker 543 0Votes Medium
Anker 543
The ambient temperature tolerance is medium, meaning it can operate reliably in typical indoor environments but may have limitations in extreme heat or cold.
Ability to perform in varying ambient temperatures.
In the battle of Ambient Temperature Tolerance, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 45 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Ambient Temperature Tolerance on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Temperature Range
What is the operating temperature range?
75 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes 32–104°F
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 543 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The temperature range within which the charger operates safely.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Operating Temperature Range on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Fanless Design
Is the charger fanless?
Yes 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Yes 0Votes Anker 543
Indicates whether cooling is achieved without a fan.
In the battle of Fanless Design, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Fanless Design on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Noise Level
How noisy is the charger?
0 dB 0Votes
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 543 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Operational noise produced during charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Noise Level on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Altitude Operating Range
What altitude can it operate at?
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 543 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum altitude at which the charger operates reliably.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Altitude Operating Range on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Daily Use Convenience, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Daily Use Convenience on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Indicator Behavior
How do the indicators behave?
Who knows? 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W (Help us out by suggesting one!)
15 Anker 543 0Votes Solid
Anker 543
Indicator LEDs display a solid light, likely providing clear and steady status information without blinking or color changes.
How indicator lights behave during operation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Indicator Behavior on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
User Feedback Method
How does it provide user feedback?
70 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes LED
65 Anker 543 0Votes LED
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
User feedback is provided via LED indicators, making it easy to see the charging status at a glance.
Methods used to communicate status to the user.
In the battle of User Feedback Method, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the User Feedback Method on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Setup Complexity
How complex is setup?
85 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Plug-and-Play
75 Anker 543 0Votes Plug-and-Play
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Plug-and-Play setup means the charger is ready to use immediately after plugging in without complicated configuration.
Effort required to start using the charger.
In the battle of Setup Complexity, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 10 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Setup Complexity on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Foldable Plug
Does it have a foldable plug?
Yes 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
No 0Votes Anker 543
Indicates whether the plug can fold for easier storage and travel.
In the battle of Foldable Plug, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 45 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Foldable Plug on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
One-Hand Operation
Can it be operated with one hand?
Yes 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Yes 0Votes Anker 543
Allows easy plugging and unplugging with one hand.
In the battle of One-Hand Operation, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the One-Hand Operation on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Maintenance Requirements
Does it require maintenance?
95 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes None
95 Anker 543 0Votes None
Level of maintenance needed to keep the charger functioning well.
In the battle of Maintenance Requirements, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Maintenance Requirements on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Upgradable
Can the firmware be updated?
No 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
No 0Votes Anker 543
Indicates whether the charger firmware can be updated.
In the battle of Firmware Upgradable, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Firmware Upgradable on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Mean time between failures is high, reflecting excellent reliability and low failure rates.
Average reliability level indicating how often failures are expected.
In the battle of Mean Time Between Failures, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Mean Time Between Failures on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Ability to withstand heat, humidity, and other stresses.
In the battle of Environmental Stress Resistance, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 50 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Environmental Stress Resistance on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Manufacturing Quality Level, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Manufacturing Quality Level on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Long-Term Stability
How stable is long-term performance?
95 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Stable
95 Anker 543 0Votes Stable
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Long-term stability ensures consistent performance over extended periods without degradation.
Anker 543
Long-term stability is rated stable, meaning it maintains consistent charging performance over extended periods.
Performance consistency over extended use periods.
In the battle of Long-Term Stability, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Long-Term Stability on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Insertion Cycles
How durable is the plug connection over time?
95 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes High
95 Anker 543 0Votes High
Indicates how many plug-in and unplug cycles the charger connector is designed to withstand before wear affects performance.
In the battle of Plug Insertion Cycles, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Plug Insertion Cycles on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Wear Resistance
How resistant are the ports to wear?
95 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes High
95 Anker 543 0Votes High
Resistance of charging ports to wear over time.
In the battle of Port Wear Resistance, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Port Wear Resistance on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Reliability Certification
Is reliability certified?
Yes 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Yes 0Votes Anker 543
Indicates whether reliability has been independently certified.
In the battle of Reliability Certification, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Reliability Certification on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
The device has a high energy efficiency rating, meaning it wastes minimal power during conversion and charging processes, promoting energy savings.
Overall classification of how efficiently the charger converts power.
In the battle of Energy Efficiency Rating, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Energy Efficiency Rating on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Built-in features designed to reduce energy consumption.
In the battle of Energy Saving Features, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is better than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Energy Saving Features on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Star Compliance
Is it Energy Star compliant?
No 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
No 0Votes Anker 543
Indicates compliance with Energy Star efficiency standards.
In the battle of Energy Star Compliance, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Energy Star Compliance on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Efficiency
How efficient is the charger in standby mode?
95 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes High
95 Anker 543 0Votes High
Indicates how efficiently the charger uses power while plugged in but not actively charging.
In the battle of Standby Efficiency, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Standby Efficiency on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Green Materials Usage
Are green materials used?
No 0Votes Anker 713 Nano II 45W
No 0Votes Anker 543
Uses environmentally friendly or recycled materials.
In the battle of Green Materials Usage, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is same as Anker 543 ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Green Materials Usage on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Carbon Footprint Category
What is the carbon footprint category?
35 Anker 713 Nano II 45W 0Votes Medium
95 Anker 543 0Votes Low
Estimated environmental impact from production and use.
In the battle of Carbon Footprint Category, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 60 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Carbon Footprint Category on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Customer Support Availability, Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ is worse than Anker 543 ◉ , delivering lower 50 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Customer Support Availability on Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ vs Anker 543 ◉ and help others decide!
Recaptor 
0 Cartling 
